Google AI Overviews
Conservative, consensus-driven, slow to change and heavily weighted to established domains. Winning here takes longest and lasts longest.
Ask ChatGPT about your category and it will produce a confident paragraph naming two or three companies. That paragraph is now a sales conversation you are not in the room for. GEO is the work of making sure it describes you, accurately, by name.
A model has no opinion. It reproduces the weighted agreement of its training data and its retrieved sources. Changing what it says means changing what the internet says about you, in the places it reads.
Models reason about things, not strings. If your organisation, your people and your products are not clean, connected, disambiguated entities, the model cannot be confident enough to name you and will hedge to a safer brand.
Retrieval kicks in when the answer needs specificity the weights do not hold. Original data, benchmarks and named practitioner claims force retrieval, and retrieval is where your URL appears.
Share of Answer: the percentage of your priority questions where a named engine names you, not mentions your category, names you.
Three layers of signal, plus the instrumentation to prove it moved.
Your priority questions run across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews, captured verbatim. We record whether you are named, cited, mentioned or absent, how you are characterised, and which competitor is holding the position. This becomes the baseline every later claim is measured against.
A coherent entity graph: Organization schema that agrees with your Wikidata and Crunchbase records, Person entities for your experts with real credentials, sameAs links that resolve, and consistent naming everywhere you appear. Models hedge when they are unsure who you are. This removes the doubt.
The pages that answer your category questions with information only you hold: original panels, teardowns, pricing transparency, methodology. Published where models retrieve from, structured so the claim is liftable and the attribution is unavoidable. This is Information Gain applied to the answer layer.
Models read Reddit, review sites, industry roundups and news, and weight third-party agreement heavily. We work the places that actually carry weight in your category, in public, without astroturf, because a fabricated consensus is both detectable and worse than none.
They disagree with each other constantly. Treating them as one surface is why most brands mis-diagnose their AI visibility.
Conservative, consensus-driven, slow to change and heavily weighted to established domains. Winning here takes longest and lasts longest.
Increasingly retrieval-backed. Responds fastest to fresh, specific, well-structured sources with clean entity signals.
Visible numbered sources and a strong preference for original data. The easiest engine to earn a citation from if you have real information.
Cautious about naming brands and quick to hedge. Strong entity signals and third-party corroboration matter more here than anywhere.
We run your category questions across five engines and send you the raw answers: who gets named, how you are described, and where the gap is. Free, one week, no contract.